No More Mr. Mom
About a year ago, when my daughter Alexis was six months old, I began to notice how differently I interacted with her than my wife did. As Leah would carry Alexis down the hall for her morning bottle, Alexis would point to portraits on the wall, and they’d stop until she wanted to move on. When they’d read books or play blocks, Leah would be able to make the transition with her to a new activity without Alexis getting impatient or frustrated each time she wanted to do something else.
This realization made me feel a bit brutish, honestly. Whenever I carried Alexis down the hallway, it was always to get to the kitchen and give her the bottle. It never occurred to me to look for anything else she might be interested in along the way. When I played with her, I’d usually end up lost in my own thoughts after a few minutes, or I’d be just as engrossed in the toys as she was. And when she cried without an obvious reason, my only two solutions were to distract her by whooping or toss her in the air until she started to laugh.
Seeing Leah respond with such awareness to Alexis’s feelings made me want to be more aware myself. While my family experience and personality have made that difficult, I’ve learned recently that there are identifiable patterns in how typical dads play with their kids that are different from how mothers do it—and that these differences are good.
All this seems obvious enough, I know, but since I’ve always thought that a lack of paternal attentiveness to kids’ feelings is inherently bad, hearing that dads can’t, and shouldn’t, compete with moms in the category of emotional receptivity was liberating for me. In his book ‘The Good Father: On Men, Masculinity, and Life in the Family’, Mark O’ Connell explains how the kind of involvement that I have with Alexis as characteristic of dads.
Fathers, says O’ Connell, tend to play more vigorously and unpredictably with children than mothers do. He cites other psychologists, namely James Herzog and Steven Cooper, who have come up with the terms “disruptive attunement” and “benevolent disruption,” respectively, to describe concepts of paternal involvement that are beneficial to kids. Whereas mothers tend to adjust to the children’s moods, fathers are more likely to “intrude, disrupt, stir up, demand, and insist”—to adjust the kids to fit their moods.
How does this help? O’ Connell believes that these expectations can actually enable kids to adjust themselves to confrontational situations in life—whether it be immediate physical danger or the long-term struggle between achievement and avoidance. He states, “And, in seeing his children as he wishes them to be he might not be acting like a narcissistic son of a b****. He might, in fact, be holding out a vision of hope, of growth, of possibility—indeed of the future.”
The moral of the story for me (and the premise of O’ Connell’s book): we all need to change in order to become better dads, but that change doesn’t mean acting more like a mom. We can admire our wives’ mothering qualities, but we need our own fathering role models. That, I believe, is an important purpose of this blog. Keep it up, guys!
